Legal Opinion

New York Underwriters Insurance v. Doty

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 23, 1990No. 23887-6-IPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grosse, A.C.J.

— In this declaratory judgment action, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of New York Underwriters Insurance Company (NYU). The trial court ruled that NYU had no duty to defend and indemnify Henry Doty (Doty) in a personal injury action brought by his ex-wife, Judith A. Engebretson (Engebretson). She appeals. We affirm.

Doty was a named insured under an NYU homeowners policy that provided both property and liability coverage. An exclusion in the policy provided, in pertinent part:

1. Coverage E — Personal Liability and Coverage F— ... do not apply to bodily injury…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Rodriguez v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. SommervilleWashington Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Woo v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Clark v. BainesWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Pepper v. J.J. Welcome Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API