Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. City of Albuquerque

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 17, 2012No. 11-2248PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-Appellants, eight operators and a supervisor at the City of Albuquerque’s 311 Citizen Contact Center, appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees City of Albuquerque, Ed Adams, and Esther Tenenbaum, on claims arising from their termination. Gonzales v. City of Albuquerque, 849 F.Supp.2d 1123 (D.N.M.2011). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Background

The City of Albuquerque (the City) has a 311 Citizen Contact Center (CCC) to handle calls placed to the City’s 311, non-emergency telephone number. Aplt. App.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russillo v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Toevs v. ReidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. Brammer-Hoelter v. Twin Peaks Charter AcademyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. Hartbarger v. Frank Paxton Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Trujillo v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dinse v. Carlisle Foodservice Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Wiseman v. New Breed Logistics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2014
  3. Brassell v. City of Santa RosaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
  4. Midway Leasing, Inc. v. Wagner Equip. Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  5. Morales v. Supreme Maintenance Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API