Legal Opinion

Rumple v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1988No. 27A02-8712-CR-521PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Appellant-defendant Daniel G. Rumple (Rumple) appeals from his conviction by the court of possession of marijuana in an amount less than 30 grams, a class A misdemeanor, 1 asserting that there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction, and that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay restitution.

We affirm the conviction but remand for correction of the sentence.

On November 15, 1985, David Stephenson (Stephenson), of the Marion Police Department, while working undercover, met Ken Coleman (Coleman) at a pool hall in Montpelier, Indiana. Coleman and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Martin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. EvansAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Fyock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. O'DONNELLSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Reinbold v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ellis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Laker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Brock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Everroad v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API