Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Everroad v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1991No. 03A01-9005-CR-179Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSullivan, Judge

Without comment, I concur as to Issues Three, Five, Six, Seven, Eight, Nine, Twelve, Sixteen and Seventeen. Without comment, I concur in result as to Issues One, Four, Ten, Eleven and Eighteen. As to the other issues, and for reasons set forth, I concur in part, concur in result in part, and dissent in part.

Of significant import, of determinative import in my estimation, are the issues concerning standing to challenge the *57searches and, in light of the evidence seized, whether the evidence is sufficient to support the convictions.

Each of the convictions challenged is for possession with intent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. DavenportMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Petty v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Ledcke v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API