Legal Opinion
Security Insurance v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 16, 1931No. 7667PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The Court of Appeals rendered the following decision: “1. ‘The general rule is that a motion for new trial, which includes a brief of the evidence, must be made during the term at *892which the trial was had; and where a motion for new trial is made in term, and no brief of the evidence is filed [during that term], and no order of court is taken extending the time at which the brief of evidence may be filed, it is proper to dismiss the motion [upon its hearing in vacation or at a subsequent term]. These requirements are jurisdictional! Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645 (104 S. E. 907), and cit. 2.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garraux v. RossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Broadway National Bank v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Luke v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Verner v. GannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Cross v. Coffin-Fletcher Packing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Security Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Security Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Jones v. Winn-Lovett Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Wallace v. SpeedCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Drew v. DrewCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935