Legal Opinion
Security Insurance v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 31, 1931No. 20052, 20065PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Broyles, 0. J.
Under the decision of the Supreme Court in this case (171 Ga. 891, 157 S. E. 93), the refusal of the trial judge to dismiss the motion for a new trial was not error. The former judgments of this court in this case (40 Ga. App. 688, 151 S. E. 410), reversing that judgment of the trial court (excepted to in the cross-bill of exceptions), and dismissing the main bill of exceptions, are hereby vacated.
This was a suit on a policy of fire insurance covering a certain building. The policy provided that “this entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Palatine Insurance v. DickensonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Fox v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Security Insurance v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Security Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
3Cited by14 opinions
- Guardian Life Insurance v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Hurley v. National-Ben Franklin Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Jackson v. Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Neese v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Security Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.