Hogar v. Community Development Commission
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* 1]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENKE, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff and appellant Hogar Dulce Hogar (Hogar) successfully and substantially altered defendant and appellant Community Development Commission of the City of Escondido’s (the agency) contributions to a state-mandated fund for low-cost housing. Although Hogar did not succeed in obtaining all of the relief it sought, the trial court found that it achieved its primary goal. This determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Hence Hogar was entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure 2 section 1021.5.
In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Winterrowd v. American General Annuity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jason Yamada v. Nobel Biocare Holding AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- 569 East County Boulevard LLC v. Backcountry Against the Dump, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- In re Taco Bell Wage & Hour ActionsDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Cates v. ChiangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.