Legal Opinion
Jason Yamada v. Nobel Biocare Holding Ag
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 20, 2016No. 14-55263PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on April 20, 2016 and appearing at 2016 WL 1579705 is hereby amended. The amended opinion will be filed concurrently with this order.
The opinion is amended as follows:
On page 13, line 6 <normally> has been added. The sentence now reads: Accordingly, we have previously held that an opposing party normally has a right to see the timesheets on which a district court relied in issuing a fee award. >
On page 15, line 5 <Here> has been added. The sentence now reads <Here, the Due Process Clause requires that opposing counsel have access to the time-sheets relied on to support…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Carl PetrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Steve Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Yassir Fazaga v. FbiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Cdk Global LLC v. Mark BrnovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Kenneth Holley-Gallegly v. Ta Operating, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.