United States v. Carter
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFerguson, Judge
I concur in part and dissent in part.
I agree with Judge Kilday’s scholarly discussion of the issue regarding search and seizure and the determination that no illegality is to be found here. A search conducted by American officers for the recovery of the fruits of crime, based on probable cause and authorized by a proper person, is to be governed by American law when its product is' tendered in evidence at a United States court-martial. It is to the United States Constitution that we must look in measuring the exercise of Federal power, and by its standards we must be guided in the receipt of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- United States v. AutreyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. MeansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.