Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Carter

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 8, 1966No. 19,228Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFerguson, Judge

I concur in part and dissent in part.

I agree with Judge Kilday’s scholarly discussion of the issue regarding search and seizure and the determination that no illegality is to be found here. A search conducted by American officers for the recovery of the fruits of crime, based on probable cause and authorized by a proper person, is to be governed by American law when its product is' tendered in evidence at a United States court-martial. It is to the United States Constitution that we must look in measuring the exercise of Federal power, and by its standards we must be guided in the receipt of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. State v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  3. United States v. AutreyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. MeansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API