Fulmer v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 85.] FULMER, APPELLANT, v. INSURA PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, D.B.A. THE SHELBY INSURANCE GROUP, APPELLEE. [Cite as Fulmer v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Co.,
2002-Ohio-64] Insurance—Underinsured motorist coverage—Insured gives underinsurance carrier notice of a tentative settlement prior to release—Release will not preclude recovery of underinsurance benefits, when—Insured satisfies exhaustion requirement in underinsured motorist provision in insurance policy, when. (No. 00-1788—Submitted October 3, 2001—Decided January 16,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- McDonald v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002