Legal Opinion

Fulmer v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2002No. 2000-1788PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 85.] FULMER, APPELLANT, v. INSURA PROPERTY & CASUALTY COMPANY, D.B.A. THE SHELBY INSURANCE GROUP, APPELLEE. [Cite as Fulmer v. Insura Prop. & Cas. Co.,

2002-Ohio-64] Insurance—Underinsured motorist coverage—Insured gives underinsurance carrier notice of a tentative settlement prior to release—Release will not preclude recovery of underinsurance benefits, when—Insured satisfies exhaustion requirement in underinsured motorist provision in insurance policy, when. (No. 00-1788—Submitted October 3, 2001—Decided January 16,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. McDonald v. Republic-Franklin InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API