Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cassidy

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 28, 1990No. 90-P-436PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

This case was reported to us by a Superior Court judge in response to a motion to dismiss an indictment on double jeopardy grounds after a trial ended in a mistrial. We must determine whether “manifest necessity” justified the declaration of a mistrial. After jury deliberations began, the jury foreperson informed the trial judge about a previously undisclosed experience of one juror that raised a question of possible juror bias. After two conferences with counsel, the judge, over defense counsel’s objection, 1 declared a mistrial. The case was then scheduled for retrial, whereupon the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BeauchampMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. CassidyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Ray v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. StracuzziMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API