Commonwealth v. Cassidy
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
This case was reported to us by a Superior Court judge in response to a motion to dismiss an indictment on double jeopardy grounds after a trial ended in a mistrial. We must determine whether “manifest necessity” justified the declaration of a mistrial. After jury deliberations began, the jury foreperson informed the trial judge about a previously undisclosed experience of one juror that raised a question of possible juror bias. After two conferences with counsel, the judge, over defense counsel’s objection, 1 declared a mistrial. The case was then scheduled for retrial, whereupon the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BeauchampMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. CassidyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Ray v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Commonwealth v. StracuzziMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991