Legal Opinion

Prevratil v. Mohr

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 10, 1996PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

The primary issue is whether we should create an exception from the entire controversy doctrine for automobile-negligence cases. Specifically, the question is whether the entire controversy doctrine bars the personal injury action of plaintiffs, Joseph *183Prevratil, and his wife, Lisa, when counsel for his employer’s insurer defended Prevratil and the employer in a prior action arising out of the same automobile accident as gives rise to Prevratil’s present action.

The Law Division granted the motion for summary judgment by defendants George…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  2. Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  3. DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Crispin v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Aetna Ins. Co. v. Gilchrist Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Rycoline Products, Inc. v. C & W UnlimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Olds v. DonnellySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Oliver v. AmbroseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Joel v. MorroccoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  5. K-Land Corp. No. 28 v. Landis Sewerage AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API