Legal Opinion

Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Etoch

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 13, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKibby, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether or not the indemnity insurance company is liable on the policy for the payment of damages incurred by the insured in the operation of his automobile truck being driven, at the time of the injury, by a boy eleven years of age.

The material parts of the policy are:

“The Ætna Casualty & Surety Company does hereby insure the assured, subject to all special provisions contained herein and the general provisions indorsed herein, which are hereby referred to and made a part of this policy. G-eneral provisions: 9. Limitation of use: Unless otherwise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Nathan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Brock v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  4. Hossley v. Union Indemnity Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BelsheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
  2. Tresa K. Ross v. Royal Globe Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Johnson v. Travelers' InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Raptis v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API