Legal Opinion
Tresa K. Ross v. Royal Globe Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1980No. 79-1338PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELMO B. HUNTER, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the Royal Globe Insurance Company [“Royal Globe”] in a suit to recover on a homeowners insurance policy brought by Tresa K. Ross [“Ms. Ross”], the daughter of the insureds, Darrell Ross and his wife, Tresa Ross. We reverse and remand with instructions.
The complicated matter in dispute here is the applicability of an exclusion clause in Royal Globe’s insurance contract with Darrell and Tresa Ross.
On May 9, 1972, Darrell and Tresa Ross entered into a one year insurance contract with Royal Indemnity…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- MFA Mutual Ins. Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
- The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. William T. StoverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. OwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Aetna Insurance v. ShortSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bruce Norton and Linda Norton, Husband and Wife v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local Union 238 v. C.R.S.T., Inc. (Sic)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Safeco Insurance Co. v. LindbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bruce Norton and Linda Norton, Husband and Wife v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers, Local Union 238 v. C.R.S.T., Inc. (Sic)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.