Legal Opinion

Sorrick v. Consolidated Telephone Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1954No. Docket 49; Calendar 46,126PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBttshnell, J.

Plaintiff Douglas M. Sorrick at one time was the general manager, president and director of defendant, the Consolidated Telephone Company of Springport. That company was organized on September 21, 1928, under the provisions of PA 1883, No 129, as amended (CL 1948, § 484.1 et seq. [Stat Ann § 22.1411 et seq.] ). Its authorized capital stock was $25,000, divided into 1,000 shares at a par value of $25 each, $11,100 being subscribed at the time its articles of association were filed with the secretary of State on January 3,1929.

At its organizational meeting the members adopted a “constitution”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagner Electric Corp. v. Hydraulic Brake Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Costello v. FarrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Weber v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kintzinger v. MillinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Sankin v. 5410 Connecticut Avenue CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
  3. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. National Memorial Gardens, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hopwood v. Topsham Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  5. Goodar Investment Co. v. Detroit Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API