Legal Opinion

Hopwood v. Topsham Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 7, 1957No. 1844PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHulburd, J.

In October 1954, the plaintiff acquired two shares of stock in the defendant telephone company. By his suit in equity, he seeks to compel the defendant company and its officers to transfer title to him to the two shares and to issue a new certificate of stock in his name. It is the defendants’ contention that the plaintiff is not entitled to the relief he seeks by reason of a restriction in the defendant corporation’s by-laws. This restriction came about as a result of the action taken by the stockholders at a special meeting held August 31, 1954. At that time the by-laws were amended so as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doss v. YinglingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Costello v. FarrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Chaffee v. Farmers' Co-Operative Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sorrick v. Consolidated Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Hoosier Chemical Works, Inc. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kintzinger v. MillinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  2. Sankin v. 5410 Connecticut Avenue CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968
  3. Stenehjem v. SetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ward v. City Drug Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  5. Minor v. Cyclops Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API