Legal Opinion

City of Erie v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 2011PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

In this appeal by allowance, we consider, inter alia, whether a public employer committed an unfair labor practice when it unilaterally eliminated firefighter pension benefits, which were found to be legal, without first collectively bargaining with the firefighters’ representative. The Collective Bargaining by Policemen and Firemen Act, commonly known as Act 111 (“Act 111”),1 by its express terms, requires negotiation over the modification or elimination of pension benefits, and we find no applicable exception to this statutory mandate. Thus, for the reasons stated more…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Philadelphia Fire Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Tp. of Moon v. POL. OFFICE. OF TP. OF MOONSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. City of Philadelphia v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 22Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lower Swatara Twp. v. Pa. Labor Relations Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Fraternal Order of Police, Flood City Lodge No. 86 v. City of JohnstownCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Kaolin Workers Union v. Pa. Labor Relations Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. American Federation of State v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Dailey v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API