Atkinson v. . Truesdell
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Hew York, entered upon an order made June 28, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. This was an action for a breach of contract. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.
Plaintiffs were copartners doing business under the name of The Hawley Glass Company, Limited, at Hawley, Pennsylvania. William F. Dorflinger was their chairman and selling agent. On the 20th of July, 1882, whilst acting for and on their behalf, he contracted with the defendant to manufacture, sell and deliver to him a large quantity of glass pickle bottles at prices specifically named “ to be made after September 1st, and to be taken by January 1st, 1883; terms, sixty days net on dock in Hew York.” The defendant from time to time ordered bottles under the contract, to be shipped to him, up…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dana v. . FiedlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
3Cited by15 opinions
- Russell v. BooksNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Underwood v. . Greenwich Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Smith Co. v. MoscahladesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- Oswego Falls Pulp & Paper Co. v. Stecher Lithographic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. NarzisenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.