Legal Opinion
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Narzisenfeld
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 10, 1924No. 48PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). This action was brought to recover the amount it is claimed the defendant agreed to pay to plaintiff for 400 cases of eggs sold and delivered by the latter to the former in New York City in September, 1920. The eggs at the time of the sale were in a warehouse in the city of New York.
It appears that the defendant’s representative called at the plaintiff’s place of business in New York and inquired whether he had a carload of eggs for sale. A carload usually consists of 400 eases. The plaintiff replied that he had several carloads of very good eggs. The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Simmons Creek Coal Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Renner v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Slaughter's Administrator v. GersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sanford Construction Co. v. S & H CONTRACTORS, INC.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Opper v. Hancock Securities CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Famous Music Corporation v. Seeco Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co. v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Southern Music Publishing Co. v. Seeco Records, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.