Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rooney v. Myers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1987Published

1DissentLevine, J.

Levine, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. The statutory presumption of express or implied permission (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388) is a strong one and, even when rebutted by substantial uncontradicted evidence, ordinarily this only creates an issue of fact for the jury (May v Heiney, 12 NY2d 683; Leotta v Plessinger, 8 NY2d 449; Piwowarski v Cornwell, 273 NY 226, 229; Ryder v Cue Car Rental, 32 AD2d 143, 147; Reyes v Sternberg, 27 AD2d 828; Cosimo v Hollenbeck, 19 AD2d 921). At the very least, since the presumption shifts the risk of nonpersuasion to the defendant owner, issues of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leotta v. PlessingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Piwowarski v. CornwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Albouyeh v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Albouyeh v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Ryder v. Cue Car Rental, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API