Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. John C. Regan & Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1909No. 7545PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered May 1, 1908, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial before the court without a jury, in an action upon an indemnity bond.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In July, 1903, John C. Regan & Company entered into a contract with the city of Seattle by the terms of which they agreed, for a stated consideration, to construct concrete sidewalks between certain designated points. The contract was in writing and contained, among others, a condition to the effect that the contractors would erect and maintain good and sufficient guards, barricades and signals at all unsafe places at or near where the work contemplated in the contract was to be done, and would indemnify and save harmless the city of Seattle from all suits and actions of every name and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. American Bonding Co. v. LoebWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Denny v. SaywardWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. City of Seattle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. City of Spokane v. CostelloWashington Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SponbergWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Commissioners of Lexington v. Ætna Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. City of Seattle v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kibler v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Lexington v. . Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API