Legal Opinion

Lexington v. . Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 11, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After stating the case: As a general rule, when indemnity is sought by one who has been adjudged liable for damages arising from negligence for which another, as between themselves, is primarily liable, the judgment in the action against the former is evidence in the action brought for indemnity that the defendant in the first action, plaintiff in the second, was liable for the damages, and when notice has been given to defend, of the amount of the damages arising from the injury, but it does not establish which of the wrongdoers is (223) primarily liable, unless that question was involved in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Village of Port Jervis v. . First National B'k.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Butts v. . ScrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Southern Railway News Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Cherry v. Canal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Johnson v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Kibler v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Johnson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Sweet v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API