Legal Opinion

United States v. Kirksey

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 16, 1955No. 7111PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:

We are once more called on to determine whether certain ostensible offenses reflected in the findings of a general court-martial constitute crimes known to military law. Charged with dishonorably failing to pay a debt and —in twelve specifications — with dishonorably failing to maintain sufficient funds in a banking account,1 the accused officer was convicted of no more than “discreditably” failing to deal with both sorts of financial obligation. After receiving a sentence to dismissal from the service, which was affirmed — together with all findings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. DownardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. Spencer Companies v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  3. Seidle v. GATX Leasing Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. CumminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. TimberlakeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  4. United States v. MoseleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. BullmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API