United States v. Kirksey
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. BROSMAN, Judge:
We are once more called on to determine whether certain ostensible offenses reflected in the findings of a general court-martial constitute crimes known to military law. Charged with dishonorably failing to pay a debt and —in twelve specifications — with dishonorably failing to maintain sufficient funds in a banking account,1 the accused officer was convicted of no more than “discreditably” failing to deal with both sorts of financial obligation. After receiving a sentence to dismissal from the service, which was affirmed — together with all findings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. DownardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- Spencer Companies v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
- Seidle v. GATX Leasing Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. CumminsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. TimberlakeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. MoseleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. BullmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.