Legal Opinion
Buckham v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided April 17, 2018No. 538, 2016PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRAYNOR, Justice:
David Buckham was convicted at trial of assault in the first degree and related charges in connection with a shooting. His appeal presents two questions of criminal procedure. First, we consider the propriety of the trial court's decision to call a recess at the State's request so that one of the State's witnesses, who was in the middle of testifying-and in the middle of recanting a statement he had given to investigators before trial-could consult with his lawyer. Buckham-who was forbidden by the trial court from cross-examining the witness about what transpired during the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State of Washington v. Zachary James FairleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Pohland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
- Abney & Proctor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
- Blackwood v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2023
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.