Legal Opinion

State of Washington v. Zachary James Fairley

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 18, 2020No. 35616-7PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FILED FEBRUARY 18, 2020 In the Office of the Clerk of Court WA State Court of Appeals, Division III IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION THREE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) No. 35616-7-III ) Respondent, ) ) v. ) PUBLISHED OPINION ) ZACHARY JAMES FAIRLEY, ) ) Petitioner. ) PENNELL, A.C.J. — Modern cell phones are unique devices, capable of storing vast amounts of personal data. To guard against governmental invasion of this information, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution generally requires explicit authorization to search a cell phone through a court-issued…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. State of Washington v. Joshua J. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  3. State of Washington v. Modesto Bravo Gonzalez Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API