Legal Opinion
Ni-Q, LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 13, 2019No. Case No. 3:17-cv-934-SIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Michael H. Simon, District Judge.
In this patent action, Plaintiff Ni-Q, LLC ("Ni-Q") seeks a declaration that it has not infringed U.S. Patent No. 8,628,921 ("the '921 Patent") (relating to methods for testing milk from human donors). Ni-Q also seeks a declaration that the '921 Patent is invalid. Ni-Q further seeks money damages and injunctive relief under Oregon's Unlawful Trade Practices Act. By counterclaim, Defendant Prolacta Bioscience, Inc. ("Prolacta") seeks money damages and injunctive relief against Ni-Q. Prolacta alleges that the inventors of the '921 Patent have assigned their…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ni-Q, LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019