Legal Opinion
Ni-Q, LLC v. Prolacta Bioscience, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 20, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00934Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON NI-Q, LLC, Case No. 3:17-cv-934-SI Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. PROLACTA BIOSCIENCE, INC., Defendant. Brenna K. Legaard and Angela E. Addae, SCHWABE,WILLIAMSON & WYATT PC, 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1900, Portland, OR 97204. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff. Kristin L. Cleveland, KLARKQUIST SPARKMAN LLP, 121 SW Salmon Street, Suite 1600, Portland, OR 97204; Orion Armon, COOLEY LLP, 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 900, Broomfield, CO 80021; Alexandra Mayhugh, COOLEY LLP, 1333 2nd Street, Suite 400, Santa Monica, CA 90401; Nicholas G.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.