Legal Opinion

State v. Jacobs

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The defendant was convicted of an aggravated assault and he appeals.

His first assignment of error—that there was not sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction— is not well taken.

Defendant’s remaining assignment of error cannot be disposed of as summarily. Defendant assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to grant defendant’s motion that the notes of a testifying police officer be turned over to defendant to use in cross-examination of the officer.

Whether or not it was the defendant who committed the alleged assault was a critical issue. An Ontario police officer testified for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  5. State v. TranchellOregon Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FleischmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  3. State v. KefferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  4. State v. McKeenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API