Legal Opinion

Andrade v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1996No. B097651PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

The issue is whether a defendant in a criminal case can be compelled under the reciprocal discovery statutes to supply the prosecution with his statements about the offense made to and relied upon by a psychotherapist for the purpose of preparing a report for the defense. We conclude these statements are covered by the attorney-client privilege and are exempt from discovery under the provisions of Penal Code section 1054.6.

*1611Facts and Proceedings Below

Armando Andrade is charged with murder. At his request, the court appointed a psychologist to examine him pursuant to Evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Rodriguez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Maldonado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. Landers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Andrade v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API