Andrade v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
The issue is whether a defendant in a criminal case can be compelled under the reciprocal discovery statutes to supply the prosecution with his statements about the offense made to and relied upon by a psychotherapist for the purpose of preparing a report for the defense. We conclude these statements are covered by the attorney-client privilege and are exempt from discovery under the provisions of Penal Code section 1054.6.
*1611Facts and Proceedings Below
Armando Andrade is charged with murder. At his request, the court appointed a psychologist to examine him pursuant to Evidence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Rodriguez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Maldonado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. Landers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Andrade v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.