Legal Opinion

Maldonado v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 2012No. S183961PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

A criminal defendant who tenders his or her mental state as a guilt or penalty issue waives the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, “ ‘to the extent *1117necessary to permit a proper examination of that condition.’ ” (People v. Carpenter (1997) 15 Cal.4th 312, 412 [63 Cal.Rptr.2d 1, 935 P.2d 708] (Carpenter); see Buchanan v. Kentucky (1987) 483 U.S. 402, 422-423 [97 L.Ed.2d 336, 107 S.Ct. 2906] (Buchanan).) In order to afford the prosecution a fair opportunity to rebut mental-state evidence proffered by the defense, a…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. NievesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  4. People v. SuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API