Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Justin Dillard Thomas

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 2017No. A16-51PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge

After a jury convicted appellant on charges of being a felon in possession of a firearm and of first-degree aggravated robbery, he was given an enhanced sentence of 180 months. He challenges his conviction and his sentence. We affirm.

FACTS

In August 2014, appellant Justin Thomas, a black male then 24, and another male approached J.S., a white male, who was walking down a street. Appellant pointed a gun at J.S.’s chest, told him to empty his pockets, and frisked him. J.S. described his assailant to the police as an African-American with lighter skin, whose hair was in a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. KuhnauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Antonio Dirrell HughCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  2. State of Minnesota v. Dylan Thomas PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API