Legal Opinion

Seitz v. Kothe-Wells & Bauer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1919No. 9,830PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Marion Superior Court (99,029); W. W. Thornton, Judge. Action by Kotbe-Wells and Bauer against Charles Seitz and another. From the judgment rendered, the defendant named appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, J.

This action was begun by the KotheWells and Bauer Company, appellee, to foreclose a chattel mortgage executed by one Daniel E. Rogers, *201on January 6, 1915, to secure the payment to appellee, when it should become due, of a certain promissory note of even date, for the sum of $206.68 due in thirty days, and upon payment of which a default had been made.

In June, 1914, appellant had loaned to said Rogers the sum of $500 and had also indorsed a certain promissory note in the amount of $700 for said Rogers, and to secure the appellant in the matter said Rogers had executed to appellant a chattel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McFarland v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Gavin v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bahar v. Tadros Etc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Unemployment Compensation Board of Unemployment Compensation Division v. BurtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. General Electric Co. v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API