Legal Opinion

Harris v. Christy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1949No. 37,400PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This is a forcible entry and detainer action. The plaintiff prevailed and the defendants have appealed.

The principal question presented is one of jurisdiction. The action was brought in the city court of Wichita where the trial resulted in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appealed. It appears they thereafter discovered a summons had been issued in the case in violation of G. S. 1935, 61-1305, which forbids the issuance thereof prior to the filing of a verified complaint. They filed a demurrer in the district court pursuant to G. S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wagstaff v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Ohio Hydrate & Supply Co. v. H. W. Underhill Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Bell v. DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. Purcell v. MerrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Bozich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ray Beckman v. Hurlbut Graves, Edward Danills, and Stanser Amack, A.S.C. Review Committee, United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  2. Sovereen v. MeadowsUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lee v. BeuttelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. In Re Care & Treatment of SearcySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Rudy v. WhaleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API