Legal Opinion

Ohio Hydrate & Supply Co. v. H. W. Underhill Construction Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1935No. 31,995PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*214The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The question in this case is^the extent of authority of the district court to dismiss an action brought before it by a fatally defective appeal from a city court, which had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter.

Plaintiff sued defendant in the city court of Wichita for $900 due on account. Defendant answered by a counterclaim. ‘After a trial, judgment was rendered for plaintiff, and defendant undertook to appeal. The attempt was ineffectual for lack of bond, and the omission to give bond was not curable by amendment. (Auto Trunk…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wagstaff v. ChallissSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. HoweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Auto Trunk Co. v. HahnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Ball v. BiggamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. Shuster v. FinanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FreshourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. McCracken v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Jensen v. City of ChanuteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Russell v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Underwood v. AllmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API