Legal Opinion

Leap v. Braziel

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1938No. 2179—7133PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERMAN, Commissioner. .

This suit was instituted by defendant in error Cindia Hughes Braziel against plaintiff in error Albert W. Leap to recover damages for personal injuries, which injuries resulted from a collision between a car driven by defendant in error and a taxicab driven by an employee of plaintiff in error. The parties will be designated as in the trial court. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of plaintiff and said judgment in that respect was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 93 S.W.2d 1213.

Practically the sole question to be determined here is whether or not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phoenix Refining Co. v. TipsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. BufkinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Leap v. BrazielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Milliken v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ulico Casualty Co. v. Allied Pilots Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sisti v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. City of Wichita Falls v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Soper v. MedfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Brown Express, Inc. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API