Legal Opinion

Soper v. Medford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1953No. 3012PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Homer Medford, Myrtle Medford Shaw, Bonnie Medford Nichols, Bertha Currine, and others, sued Mary L. Soper, a widow, in trespass to try title to Lots 1, 14, 6 and 7 in Blocks D, C, and A over 3413, Dal Cliff Addition to Dallas. In a second count, plaintiffs alleged that the only interest held by Mrs. Soper was by virtue of her purchase of said lots at a constable’s sale on February 7, 1949, under an order •of sale issued by a District Court in cause Number 14,690-E; that the sale was void and did not affect plaintiffs’ ownership because the defendant in cause, R. E.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Holt v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bumpass v. BondTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Trustees of the Casa View Assembly of God Church v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Englander Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Cline v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API