Soper v. Medford
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRISSOM, Chief Justice.
Homer Medford, Myrtle Medford Shaw, Bonnie Medford Nichols, Bertha Currine, and others, sued Mary L. Soper, a widow, in trespass to try title to Lots 1, 14, 6 and 7 in Blocks D, C, and A over 3413, Dal Cliff Addition to Dallas. In a second count, plaintiffs alleged that the only interest held by Mrs. Soper was by virtue of her purchase of said lots at a constable’s sale on February 7, 1949, under an order •of sale issued by a District Court in cause Number 14,690-E; that the sale was void and did not affect plaintiffs’ ownership because the defendant in cause, R. E.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Holt v. GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Bumpass v. BondTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Klein v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Trustees of the Casa View Assembly of God Church v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Englander Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Cline v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- Temple-Inland Forest Products Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.