Legal Opinion
Verlon Musgrove v. Frank A. Eyman, Superintendent, Arizona State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1971No. 23953PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted in the Arizona state court of the crime of buying and receiving stolen property of a value in excess of $50.00. After exhausting his remedies in the state courts, he filed this habeas corpus proceeding in the district court. After a full evidentiary hearing, his petition was denied. He appeals. We affirm.
Factual Background
The following is a fair summary of the state’s evidence and the findings of the district court, as supported by the record. In the early morning of September 5, 1964, Tucson city police received a report of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Michael Terry CurranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Ernest Eugene MahlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Richard E. WoodringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Carla Jabara, John T. McClain Earl Moore, Ella Hood, Evelyn Hatch, Curtistine RideoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.