Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard E. Woodring

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 21, 1971No. 25445_1PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge:

Woodring appeals from his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 472 (possessing counterfeit money with intent to defraud) . We affirm.

Woodring challenges on several grounds, the legality of the search of his rented house, made pursuant to a warrant, and the subsequent seizure of certain counterfeit bills that were admitted into evidence against him at trial.

First, Woodring argues that the affidavit in support of a search warrant was insufficient because it recited only observations of “outwardly innocent” acts and information from informants of untested reliability. We…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Robert McClure Jr., and Donald Gaxiola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. George H. Lustig, United States of America v. Gregory D. PedersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Francisco Bustamante-Gamez, United States of America v. Abelardo Garcia-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. United States v. Pamela Jean GanttCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Russell Bonner, United States of America v. Wayne BonnerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API