Legal Opinion

Schoch v. Luepold & Stevens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 4, 1999No. 92-09982; CA A98548PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

The Workers’ Compensation Board awarded claimant $3,000 in attorney fees for time spent successfully challenging an order of the Director of the Department of Consumer and Business Services that denied claimant’s request for back surgery. This court affirmed the fee award, and the Supreme Court reversed and remanded. It held that the Board’s explanation was not sufficient to determine whether the Board had acted within its discretion in setting the fee. Schoch v. Leupold & Stevens, 325 Or 112, 934 P2d 410 (1997). On remand, the Board offered a more detailed explanation and adhered to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Jefferson v. Sam's CafeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. SAIF Corp. v. BaconCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. D'ABBRACCI v. Shaw-BastianCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. SAIF Corp. v. WartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. In re the Marriage of RoppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Northwest Pump & Equipment Co. v. StachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Northwest Pump & Equipment Co. v. StachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API