Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ezell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1968No. Appeal, 45PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

The sole issue raised in this proceeding under the Post Conviction Hearing Act is whether appellant knowingly and intelligently waived the right to appeal his conviction of murder in the second degree. The court below held an evidentiary hearing limited solely to this question, and decided that Ezell did so waive. We disagree and therefore hold that appellant must now be given leave to file post-trial motions, and if these motions are denied, be permitted to take a direct appeal to this Court. Furthermore, if indigent, counsel must be appointed.

Although the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Commonwealth v. RitcheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. NormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API