Commonwealth v. Norman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
Appellant Albert Norman here contests the dismissal of his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Hearing Act1 in which he alleged he had been denied his right of appeal. The hearing court refused *219to hear any testimony on whether Norman knowingly waived his appeal rights, ruling as a matter of law that appellant had finally litigated this question and therefore no hearing was required. For the reasons that follow, we disagree and remand the record to the PCHA court for a hearing on whether appellant knew of his right to appeal and of his right to have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. FieroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MonicaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.