Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1968No. Appeal, 29PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Much of what we said in Commonwealth v. Wilson, 430 Pa. 1, 241 A. 2d 760 (1968) is applicable here. Appellant in this post-conviction proceeding requests the right to file new trial motions and appeal from a possible denial thereof, both to be done nunc pro tunc; his request is premised upon an allegation that he was not advised of the rights mandated by Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S. Ct. 814 (1963). A hearing was held, appellant’s claim denied and this appeal taken.

In Wilson, we stressed that an indigent accused may waive his Douglas rights but that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shadd v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Neal v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Fink v. RundleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FaisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. EzellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. NormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API