Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Solis
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 16, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2007-2216PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
I have this case, on the consent of both parties, for all purposes, including trial. Pending before me and ready for resolution is Plaintiff’s Motion for an Award of Fees for Expert Witness Deposition Preparation (Pltf s Mot.) [# 27],
I. BACKGROUND
The instant discovery dispute concerns fees associated with preparation work undertaken by plaintiffs expert witness, Dr. Ra-ford, for a deposition held by defendant. Plaintiff claims entitlement to the fees under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4)(C)(i), which provides that,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Borel v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- Guantanamera Cigar Co. v. Corporacion Habanos, S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States ex rel. Fago v. M & T Mortgage Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Waters v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cohen v. Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer, & Weiss, P.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Rock River Communications, Inc. v. Universal Music GroupDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- English v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.