Legal Opinion

Waters v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 28, 2007No. 02 C. 4762PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MILTON I. SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Among the numerous issues on which the litigants have crossed swords, the most recent has to do with the appropriate application of Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 26(b)(4)(C), which requires a party — in this case the City of Chicago (“City”) — to “pay the expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to discovery.” When City chose to take the deposition of Gary Skoog (“Skoog”), the opinion witness who was retained by Daniel Waters (“Waters”) to provide testimony as to his claimed damages, Skoog itemized his expenditure of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rhee v. Witco Chemical Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  2. Collins v. Village of WoodridgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Vanguard Products Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. Schmidt v. SolisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Fiber Optic Designs, Inc. v. New England Pottery, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
  4. Raymond Professional Group, Inc. v. William A. Pope Co. (In Re Raymond Professional Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  5. Nordock Inc. v. Systems Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API