Legal Opinion

Merced Bank v. Price

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1904No. S.F. No. 3213PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment dismissing the action upon the application of the defendants. The ground upon which the dismissal was made, as stated in the notice of motion, and also in the order of the court granting the same, was, that the plaintiff Merced Bank had neglected to prosecute the same with diligence, and that it had abandoned said cause. The action is upon a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. The note was executed by defendants James D. Price, Jeff D. Price, Thomas Price, and George Price, in the sum of sixty-five hundred dollars, and made…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herman v. Pacific Jute Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merced Bank v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  2. Forneris v. KrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Merced Bank v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API