Legal Opinion

Herman v. Pacific Jute Manufacturing Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1900No. S.F. No. 1564PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Appeal from a judgment dismissing the case for failure of prosecution.

The suit was brought by the plaintiff as assignee to recover the amount due on a note made to plaintiff’s assignor by the defendant April 20, 1881. The sole issue raised by the answer was as to 'the plaintiff’s ownership of the note. The motion was made October, 1897, on the “records, files, and entries” in the case; from, which it appears that the complaint was filed June 6th, and the answer October 31, 1883. From the affidavit of the plaintiff—besides matter in excuse of delay, which need not be passed on—it…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ferris v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. LaufferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Forneris v. KrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Merced Bank v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Sunset Publishing House v. Cottage Gardens NurseriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API