Legal Opinion

People v. Schunke

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1941No. Crim. 3478PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Defendants were charged in count I of the information with the crime of robbery, in that they forcibly took from the person of Otto E. Sporrer the sum of $893 in cash and checks. In count II of the information defendant Nickel was charged with the violation of the Dangerous Weapons Control Law of 1923 [Stats. 1923, p. 695; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 1970], as amended, in that he had in his possession a sawed off shot gun, he having theretofore been duly convicted of the crime of forgery on January 19, 1931, in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. In count III defendant Sehunke was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. OppenheimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. BouzasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. State v. FortesonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. People v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API