Legal Opinion

Kay v. Hillside Mines, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1939No. Civil No. 4126PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

— This is an appeal by Eva Afton Hancock Kay, hereinafter called petitioner, from an award of the Industrial Commission, hereinafter called respondent, denying her any death benefit compensation on account of the death of her late husband, John Kay.

The facts of the case are in no manner in dispute, and may be stated as follows: John Kay, hereinafter called deceased, died leaving surviving him petitioner and four minor daughters, Louise, Corrine, Janice and Doris Kay. The circumstances surrounding his death were set forth in the finding’s of respondent made upon the application of the widow…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. KamrathOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Netherton v. Lightning Delivery Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Federal Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Matlock v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Magma Copper Co. v. NaglichArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Laird v. State of Vermont Highway Dept.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API