Legal Opinion
Miller v. Glenn Miller Productions
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 23, 2004No. CV03529AHM (MCX)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT.
MATZ, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FACTUAL BACKGROUND.927
ANALYSIS.932
A. The Legal Standard for a Motion for Summary Judgment . CO CO to
B. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Adjudication: May GMP Sub-License Intellectual Property Rights Without Plaintiffs’ Permission?. CO CO 05
1. Defendant’s Threshold Arguments That the 1956 Agreement Did Not Convey a License... zd CO CO
a. The Only Reasonable Interpretation of the 1956 Agreement is That it Conveys to GMP Both a Trademark License and a License of Glenn Miller’s…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Miller v. Glenn Miller Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Airwair International Ltd. v. SchultzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Hokto Kinoko Co. v. Concord Farms, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Fitbug Ltd. v. Fitbit, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.