Commonwealth v. LaRosa
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
This is an appeal from a conviction for aggravated assault. The primary question presented is whether Commonwealth v. Bennett, 224 Pa.Super. 238, 303 A.2d 220 (1973) and its progeny preclude a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt where the evidence of guilt adduced at trial consists mainly of the victim’s out-of-court inculpatory “excited utterance,” when at trial the victim cannot recall either making the statement or the accuracy of its content. The lower court reasoned that Bennett does not prevent a conviction for assault where the declarant’s in-court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FarquharsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. RigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. GoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. NobleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ManchasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. MoquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. GreenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.